Special Report Vol. II · Q2 2026

US AI
Legislation
2026

Every State. Every Bill That Matters.

01

The Scale

0
AI bills introduced across 50 states in 2026.
Already more than double all of 2024.
1,700+ Bills Introduced MultiState.ai
50 States Active MultiState.ai
34+ Signed Into Law Plural Policy
40+ Passed Both Chambers Plural Policy

Year-over-Year Bill Introduction Growth

Sources

Full Report 50 state profiles, compliance checklists, enforcement timelines.

* You will also be subscribed to my newsletter.

02

The Map

03

State Deep Dives

Take it Offline Download the full 50-state PDF report. Impact assessments, enforcement dates, compliance checklist included.

* You will also be subscribed to my newsletter.

04

Five Battlegrounds

Five legislative categories are shaping the 2026 AI policy landscape. Each represents a distinct theory of how to govern AI, and each has a coalition of states leading the way. These are the categories that will define compliance obligations for builders over the next two years.

01

Chatbot Safety for Minors

78 bills / 27 states

The most active category in 2026. States are mandating AI identity disclosure, blocking sexually explicit content, banning manipulative engagement patterns (dependency cultivation, parent secrecy encouragement), and requiring crisis response protocols. Washington, Oregon, Georgia, and Tennessee have all enacted laws. Arizona and California are close behind.

Leading States
WA OR GA TN AZ CA
02

Healthcare and Insurance AI Restrictions

Active in 10+ states

States are attacking the use of AI in health insurance prior authorization and coverage decisions. The common requirement: AI cannot be the sole basis for denial. Human clinical judgment must remain in the loop. Utah and Washington have enacted laws. Georgia prohibits AI-only coverage decisions. Iowa is also active. California restricts AI transcription in mental health therapy.

Leading States
UT WA GA CA
03

Employment and Hiring Discrimination

Active in 8+ states

AI-assisted hiring is under siege at the state level. Illinois enacted HB 3773, a sweeping prohibition on discriminatory AI in hiring, promotion, and performance evaluation. New York City's Local Law 144 requires bias audits on automated employment decision tools. Connecticut and California are pursuing similar frameworks. The pattern: mandatory audits, mandatory notifications, and mandatory human fallback options.

Leading States
IL NY CT CA
04

Deepfakes and Content Provenance

Active in 15+ states

Two complementary legislative theories are emerging. The first targets deepfakes directly: criminal and civil liability for harmful synthetic media, with specific provisions for political ads. The second takes a provenance approach: mandatory watermarking and metadata embedded in all AI-generated audio, image, and video. Utah and Washington have enacted provenance requirements. Maryland passed deepfake protections awaiting the governor. Arizona passed content verification.

Leading States
UT WA MD AZ CA
05

Comprehensive AI Regulation

CO enacted, VA vetoed, CT active

The most contested territory. Colorado enacted SB 24-205, the first US comprehensive state AI law, covering high-risk systems that make consequential decisions in education, employment, housing, healthcare, insurance, and legal services. Texas enacted TRAIGA with a narrower prohibited-uses approach. Virginia attempted a similar Colorado-style law and was vetoed. Connecticut is trying for the third straight year. The core tension: compliance cost burden versus consumer protection.

Key States
CO TX VA CT
05

Federal vs. States

On December 11, 2025, the White House issued an executive order titled "Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence". It directed federal agencies to classify, sue, and financially pressure states into dropping their AI laws. The states kept legislating anyway.

Executive Order December 11, 2025

"Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence"

Three Preemption Mechanisms

01

FTC Policy Statement

Deadline: March 11, 2026

Directs the FTC to classify state-mandated bias mitigation requirements as deceptive trade practices.

Read analysis
02

AI Litigation Task Force

Deadline: January 10, 2026

Directs the Attorney General to establish a task force to challenge state AI laws on interstate commerce and federal preemption grounds.

Read analysis
03

BEAD Funding Conditions

Deadline: March 11, 2026

Conditions $42 billion in broadband infrastructure (BEAD) funding on repeal of state AI regulations deemed onerous.

Read analysis

What the EO Does NOT Touch

Child safety
AI compute and data center infrastructure
State government procurement and use of AI

The executive order lacks preemptive force on its own. It is not a statute enacted by Congress, and Congress has repeatedly declined to enact comprehensive federal preemption of state AI laws.

What It Means for Builders

Build to the Colorado standard. Here is why.

  • Colorado SB 24-205 is the strictest enacted state law and takes effect June 30, 2026. If your system makes decisions in education, employment, housing, healthcare, insurance, or legal services, you are in scope.
  • The executive order has no preemptive statutory force. Congress has not enacted a federal AI law. State laws remain valid and enforceable.
  • Child safety is explicitly carved out of the EO's preemption attempt. Every chatbot that targets or reaches minors must comply with state safety rules regardless of federal pressure.
  • Illinois, New York City, and California employment rules are in effect or advancing. If you use AI in hiring, promotion, or performance evaluation, you need audit and disclosure processes now.
  • Provenance requirements in Utah, Washington, and Arizona mean AI-generated content pipelines need watermarking and metadata by January 2027.